sample objections to request for production of documents california

1. 2030.070 and C.C.P. 51.12 0 Td )Tj NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER VERIFIED RESPONSES TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS, AND FOR A TRIAL CONTINUANCE AND MONETARY SANCTIONS /Annots [] T* 96.837 -24 Td 168.288 -24 Td /TT0 12 Tf >> 47.77 0 Td 2031.050, that allow the propounding party to ask for updated information bearing on answers already made and later acquired or discovered documents, tangible things, land or other property.. [(a)4 (ppe)4.8 (a)4 (r)2.1 (e)4.9 (d )9.1 (onc)14.1 (og)9.9 (e)4 (ni)-1.9 (c)13.9 (. stream endobj 44.76 0 Td [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (t)-3 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (d)8.1 (oc)4.9 (um)-2.8 (e)4.8 (nt)-2 ( w)2 (a)3.1 (s c)-6 (r)2.9 (e)3.1 (a)4 (t)-11 (e)3.9 (d )]TJ T* T* (17)Tj stream 17 0 obj -283.67 -24 Td Hardware. GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. Q Date: Mo, March 22, 1999. )-10.8 ( )-9.1 ( )]TJ . /Subtype /Type1 In litigation, written discovery typically consists of (1) Requests for Production, (2) Requests for Admission, and (3) Interrogatories. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm endobj -70.702 -24 Td Plaintiff objects to Definition No. Plaintiff objects to Definition No. 343.8 0 Td /Contents [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R] /Filter /FlateDecode -349.92 -24 Td [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. /Encoding 39 0 R /TT1 12 Tf 55 0 obj 44.77 0 Td >> )]TJ 9 i)-2 (n P)-3.1 (l)-2 (a)3.9 (i)-1.9 (nt)-2 (i)-2.8 (f)3.7 (f)3 (s\222 A)2.2 (m)-1.9 (e)4 (nde)4.8 (d a)4 (nd S)-3.9 (uppl)-2.9 (e)4.8 (m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (a)3 (l )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (s )-2 (f)1.9 (or)3.8 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2.8 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons $)-8.4 (J)-10.2 (une)3.1 ( 29, 2017$)2.9 (])-6 (. 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re Avoiding the Technical Mistakes When Drafting Written Discovery. 48.11 0 Td /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << . ET /TT1 12 Tf 67.32 0 Td /CropBox [0 0 612 792] Q T* /Type /Font 2. /TT0 12 Tf (16)Tj /Artifact <>BDC 33 0 obj ET The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. endstream q Responding party objects that the request seeks documents already in plaintiffs possession custody or control. T* I have received many requests over the years and the next couple of blogs will be responding to some of these requests. /Parent 15 0 R With regard to the 184 individuals and entities who were interviewed by the DOJ pursuant to its CID investigation of Dentsply and subsequently identified in Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures, please identify in detail all facts known to these individuals and entities that are relevant to the DOJ's claims against Dentsply in this matter. << 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 528.6613195 755.2367083 cm x%0>7P{o2:Krc\_xJ5= +\n"bL}';.b.5|4}bHXVvK! [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( a)3.1 (f)2.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (r)3.9 ( r)13 (e)4 (c)3.2 (e)4.8 (i)7.1 (pt )-2 (o)8.9 (f)3 ( EP)-2.7 (A)1.9 (\222)2.2 (s )8.8 (J)-10.9 (ul)-12.8 (y)19.8 ( )30.9 (29, 1985 l)-2.8 (e)4.8 (t)-11.9 (t)-2 (e)3 (r)3 (, Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)4 (nt)-2 (o st)-4 (a)4 (t)-2 (e)14 (d t)8.8 (ha)3.1 (t)8.9 ( EP)-2.7 (A)2.7 (\222)13 (s )]TJ /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] %PDF-1.7 (27)Tj (19)Tj /Type /Page x+ | 0 -431.088 l 65.4 648.61 Td /TT1 12 Tf /ModDate (D:20190128141404-08'00') (3)Tj >> [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] T* [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. >%9\%_N\>kuq%+"9$~]W-Uj^aRQ << /GS0 gs [(t)-1.1 (ha)3.1 (t)-2 ( \223)4 ([)-6.1 (t)-2 (])-7.9 (he)4.8 (s)-1.7 (e)4.7 ( t)-1.9 (um)-2.8 (or)3.7 (s )-1.8 (a)3 (r)2.1 (e)4 ( r)-6.9 (a)4 (r)3.8 (e)4 (, dose)1.2 ( )-9.8 (r)3.7 (e)4 (l)-1.9 (a)3 (te)1.1 (d )-9.1 (a)3.9 (nd c)3.2 (on)-10 (si)-3.9 (de)4.7 (r)3 (e)3.2 (d c)4 (om)-1.9 (pound-)-6.2 (r)2.1 (e)4 (l)-1.9 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)-5.2 (d.\224)3.1 ( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.9 (a)3.8 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ Plaintiff objects to each document request to the extent that it calls for production of a privilege log for internal documents of Plaintiff. )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ endstream >> T* acquire the most less latency era to download any of our books afterward this one. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 83.0246 679.0819 Tm /Encoding 17 0 R 49.55 0 Td )]TJ >> T* << With that in mind, the court announced that from now on in cases before this Court, any discovery response that does not comply with Rule 34s requirement to state objections with specificity (and to clearly indicate whether responsive material is being withheld on the basis of the objection) will be deemed a waiver of all objections (except as to privilege). [Emphasis added.]. -411.35 -24 Td [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. (15)Tj /florin /fraction /guilsinglleft /guilsinglright /minus /perthousand /quotedblbase /quotedblleft /quotedblright /quoteleft 44.89 0 Td (9)Tj T* )9.2 ([)-6.1 (Th)1.8 (is)-3 ( )9.1 (R)7.8 (e)3.2 (que)4.8 (s)8.2 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.2 (s )7.1 (l)-2 (i)-1.9 (st)-3.2 (e)3 (d a)4.9 (s)-1.7 ( N)2.7 (o. T* << [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ 44.75 0 Td BT (7)Tj Plaintiff does not and cannot know "all facts known" (emphasis supplied) to such individuals and entities that are relevant to the claims at issue here. -72 -24 Td Dl'|hI;%C^FqT%hE3V*S:.1~~K~|b\?q,E+9N0pg 2. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm T* 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re /TT0 9.96 Tf (2. T* Each response, if any, is subject to any and all objections as to competence, relevance, materiality, propriety, and admissibility, and any and all endstream /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re /Fields [] [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( EP)-1.2 (A )2 (i)9.9 (nf)3 (or)13 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (d Mo)7.2 (nsa)12.1 (nt)8.9 (o on J)-11.8 (ul)-12 (y)29.9 ( )30.9 (29, 1)-10 (985, t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (a)2 (f)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( E)11 (P)-4.8 (A)1.9 (\222)13 (s )]TJ T* )Tj T* 4 0 obj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm -103.32 -24 Td T* T* << endobj In fact, boilerplate general objections are sanctionable in California per Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513 and may result in waivers of privilege per Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry Co. v. U.S. Dist. )Tj 37 0 obj (10)Tj /TT0 12 Tf T* 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 101.3938755 107.661828 cm BT -240.96 -24 Td /Resources 59 0 R /PDFDocEncoding 39 0 R endobj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.6004 679.0819 Tm ( )Tj >> T* 29.4 648.61 Td /TT1 12 Tf Recently I received an e-mail from an attorney who followed my advice regarding General Objections. 51 0 obj Rule of Court Changes for Remote Depositions. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 253.343 -48 Td 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm /Parent 14 0 R 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. q /TT0 9.96 Tf 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm A discovery request can ask what evidence the person knows, but cannot ask what a person thinks the evidence means. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm [(e)4.8 (t)-11.9 ( seq. 11 0 obj BT Q /CropBox [0 0 612 792] (19)Tj Notwithstanding said objections, no documents. When does the 45 days to bring a motion to compel further responses to RPD begin? Q Secure .gov websites use HTTPS /Length 126 0 R (15)Tj [(a)4 (f)3.8 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (r)3 ( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (o )-10.9 (r)3 (e)4.8 (c)-6.8 (e)4.8 (i)-1.9 (ve)3.9 (d )-10.7 (EP)-1.4 (A)1.1 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (J)-12 (ul)-11.1 (y)29.9 ( 29, 1985 l)-1.9 (e)3.9 (t)-1.9 (t)-12 (e)3 (r)3 ( $)3.9 (MON)-7.7 (G)-7.1 (L)10 (Y)2.9 (04269006-)-7.8 (07$)3 (. T* Plaintiff incorporates by reference every general objection set forth above into each specific response set forth below. >> RESPONSE: Complainant contends that the following relationships to the Complainant are held for persons identified in Interrogatory No. T* Q 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm 2031.240 (pdf) states: (b) If the responding party objects to the demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of an item or category of item, the response shall do both of the following: (1) Identify with . 36 0 Td 1 See, e.g., CCP 2031.220 [". 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm T* )Tj uuid:276adb5a-b13f-4138-aeb6-45e793f2ece0 T* Whether you are responding to interrogatories or document requests, take a few tips from Fischer v. Forrest: At any discovery conference, you want to sound like the most thoughtful and reasonable lawyer in the room. Plaintiff objects to Definition No. q /Contents [88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R] 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.594463 -39.599996 cm /TT0 11.03 Tf q >> To the extent any of Defendant's document requests or its interrogatory seek documents or answers that include expert material, including but not limited to survey materials, Plaintiff objects to any such requests and interrogatory as premature and expressly reserves the right to supplement, clarify, revise, or correct any or all responses to such requests, and to assert additional objections or privileges, in one or more subsequent supplemental response(s) in accordance with the time period for exchanging expert reports set by the Court. [(D)2.8 (E)-3.7 (N)2.7 (I)-1.8 (E)-2.9 (S)]TJ >> EMC endstream 2.59 -24 Td )]TJ T* f C.C.P. /TT1 12 Tf T* (15)Tj ET /ExtGState 151 0 R [(st)-2.2 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (Notwi)-1.2 (t)-2.9 (hst)-4.8 (a)4.7 (ndi)-1.9 (ng Mo)-2 (ns)-3.9 (a)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (ob)-1.8 (j)-2.9 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (ons,)-2 ( M)-3 (onsanto )]TJ [( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)4.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (d m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (or)2.9 (a)3.1 (ndum)-1.8 ( )]TJ Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, and document request to the extent that it purports to impose any requirement or discovery obligation greater than or -3- different from those under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Rules and Orders of the Court. -334.67 -24 Td /Parent 15 0 R 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re [(t)-1.1 (um)-2 (or)2.9 (.\224)3.1 ( Mo)-1.6 (ns)-2.7 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ endobj 7. Furthermore, Civil Investigative Demand 13009 was issued to Dentsply, not to third parties. (1)Tj 482.85 624.61 Td Q [(f)3 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (ul)-2.1 (a)4 (t)-2 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (t)-2.1 (ha)3 (t)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (e)4.9 (r)3 (e)3.2 ( )-10 (a)-6 (va)3.9 (i)-1.9 (l)-2 (a)3.9 (bl)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( f)3.9 (or)3 ( sa)1.2 (l)-11.9 (e)4.8 ( i)-2.8 (n t)-2 (he)4.8 ( U)-8.8 (ni)-1.1 (t)-2 (e)3 (d S)-3 (t)-2 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (s )-1.8 (a)3 (s )-1.8 (of)1.1 ( J)-10 (une)3 ( 29, 2017, but )]TJ See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 4 to the extent that it calls for documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. [(77-)3 (4)10.8 (20)10 (, di)-1.9 (d not)-2.9 ( r)3.8 (e)4 (por)2.1 (t)-1.9 ( a)4 ( )10 (ki)-1.1 (dne)-6.9 (y)20.8 ( )19.2 (t)-1.9 (um)-2 (or)2.9 ( f)3.8 (o)-9.9 (r)2.1 ( c)4 (ont)-1.9 (r)2.9 (ol)-1.9 ( a)-5.2 (ni)7 (m)-1.8 (a)4.7 (l)-2.7 ( N)2.7 (o. /Count 2 25 0 obj [(i)-1.1 (nqui)-2 (r)-7.9 (y)20.8 ( i)-2.8 (nt)-2 (o t)-2 (he)4 ( i)-2 (nf)3.8 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (i)-12 (on t)-2 (ha)3.1 (t)-1.1 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (kn)-2 (own )1.7 (or)4 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (a)4 (di)-12.7 (l)-12 (y)20.7 ( obt)-2.7 (a)4.7 (i)-1.9 (na)3.9 (bl)-1.9 (e)3.1 (, i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( ha)3.1 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-2.1 ( i)-12.8 (de)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d a)4.8 (n)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( 12 )]TJ 40 0 obj Responding party objects that the request fails to specifically describe each individual item sought or reasonably particularize each category of item sought. W n /Type /Page [(D)1.1 (E)-2.1 (N)1.1 (IE)-3.1 (S)-4.9 ( )]TJ 1304/1307 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 18, 2017), the plaintiff requested the production of almost a decade of emails, letters, and marketing materials. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm x+ | (24)Tj Quality objectives. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [(c)4 (ont)-2 (a)4 (i)-1.9 (n a)4.5 ( pr)3 (e)-6.7 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (se)1.9 ( de)-6.7 (f)3.7 (i)-1.9 (ni)-2.9 (t)-2 (i)-2 (on of)3 ( t)-2 (he)4 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( a)3.1 (nd r)-6.1 (e)3.9 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)3 (e)-5.9 (nc)3.9 (e)3.2 (s )-2 (a)3 ( va)-5.9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.9 (t)-21.1 (y)19.1 ( of)3.8 ( t)-2.7 (ox)-9.2 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)19 ( )]TJ /Annots [] T* Dentsply International, Inc. /TT1 12 Tf (16)Tj endstream (1)Tj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 82.1952 679.0819 Tm (15)Tj (16)Tj 3. T* /ExtGState 139 0 R x%0>7P{o2:Krc\_xJ5= +\n"bL}';.b.5|4}bHXVvK! Responding party objects as it invades their and third parties right of privacy. 286.67 0 Td T* 6. stream /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ (8)Tj EMC ( )Tj /Length 138 0 R Mon)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (a)3 (nto)-2 ( o)-2 (t)-3 (he)3 (r)3 (w)2 (i)-1.9 (se)2.8 ( )]TJ (M)Tj Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing objections, Plaintiff will produce the documents responsive to this request that have not already been produced and are not protected by the privileges listed above. endobj /TT1 12 Tf << /Type /Page 5 0 obj /Subtype /HF /Contents [72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory to the extent that it purports to impose any requirement or discovery obligation greater than or different from those under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Rules and Orders of the Court. 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re )-9 (\224)3 ( Monsanto )]TJ 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.595 75.2636 Tm T* 33 )10.8 (i)-1.9 (n P)5.1 (l)-1.1 (a)13.1 (i)-1.1 (n)9.9 (t)-2.7 (i)-2 (f)12.9 (f)3 (s\222)1.8 ( A)11.1 (m)-1.8 (e)4.7 (n)9.2 (de)4.8 (d a)14 (nd )9.1 (S)-3.9 (u)10.8 (ppl)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (nt)-2.8 (a)14 (l)-2 ( R)-3 (e)4 (q)10 (ue)4 (s)9 (t)-1.1 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons)-1.8 ( \()3.7 (J)-10.9 (une)3 ( 29, )]TJ [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. 49 0 obj (20)Tj 1028. [(A)1.9 (D)2.9 (M)4 (IT)-4.8 (S)]TJ [(c)4 (ont)-2 (a)4 (i)-1.9 (n a)4.5 ( pr)3 (e)-6.7 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (se)1.9 ( de)-6.7 (f)3.7 (i)-1.9 (ni)-2.9 (t)-2 (i)-2 (on of)3 ( t)-2 (he)4 ( phr)3.8 (a)3.2 (s)-10.9 (e)4.7 ( a)4 (nd r)-7.7 (e)4.7 (f)3 (e)-5.9 (r)2.9 (e)3.1 (nc)4 (e)4.9 (s )-11.8 (a)3.1 ( va)4.8 (r)3 (i)-11.9 (e)3.1 (t)-11.9 (y)20.7 ( o)-10.7 (f)2.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)4.7 (i)-2.7 (t)7.9 (y)20 ( )]TJ Common objections to requests for production or inspection include: The request is overly broad or unduly burdensome. . 2017-10-16T17:22:13-07:00 << [(D)2 (E)-13 (N)1.1 (IE)-3.1 (S)]TJ 30 0 obj >> T* f /TT0 12 Tf 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re Service Provider. T* Similarly, the subpoena recipient may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena in the court where compliance is required. T* f |$9hB3.ma^%]tX`s6LHi#cebB)>_CZ0CjGmV;P -Q:"H,eOx#G" ,yDF.`E%RS=i /TT0 12 Tf /Name /ZaDb /GS0 gs If you need to request documents in an employment discrimination case or if you need to respond to a request for documents from the other side, you can get templates from the Legal Help Centers. /TT1 12 Tf (18)Tj 2 2. (26)Tj /XObject 152 0 R /Annots [] umass amherst softball roster. Monsanto's responses and objections to plaintiff's Requests are made solely for the purposes of discovery in this action. /quoteright /quotesinglbase /trademark /fi /fl /Lslash /OE /Scaron /Ydieresis /Zcaron /Contents [44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R] A Request for Production (also known as a Demand for Inspection) asks the other side to produce and allow copying or inspection and measuring of a document or thing. (28)Tj T* /TT0 12 Tf It went like this: I read your article Why you Need to Bring a Motion to Strike General Objections, and filed a Motion to Strike Defendants Preliminary Statement and Unmeritorious Objections. The Preliminary Statement contained many of the issues you pointed out in your article, and each of defendants responses to interrogatories and document requests contained the same 28 lines of objections. )-8 (M)-1.9 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-1.9 (o ot)-2.9 (he)4.8 (r)3 (w)1.1 (is)-3 (e)3 ( )]TJ (21)Tj endobj /Subtype /Type1 >> endstream Plaintiff objects to this request as vague and ambiguous because it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation." Q RESPONDING PARTY: ACME, INC . >> /TT1 12 Tf [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( )-49.1 (t)-2.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( )-40 (Mo)-2 (ns)-3.1 (a)4 (nt)-1.9 (o )-50.9 (c)3.9 (o)10 (nduc)14 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d)10 ( )-49.9 (no )-49.1 (a)13.9 (ni)7.1 (m)-1.9 (a)13.9 (l)-1.9 ( )-49.1 (c)3.9 (hr)2.1 (o)10.9 (n)10 (i)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( )-40 (t)-1.9 (o)9 (x)-9 (i)-2 (c)3.9 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29.1 ( )-19 (s)-1.9 (t)-2 (ud)9.9 (ies )-49.9 (on)9 ( )]TJ /TT0 9.96 Tf q /Count 20 117.349 708 Td T* 54 0 obj 20 0 obj /GS0 gs /Type /Metadata /Resources 67 0 R 0 0 612 792 re Respondent objects to the Request to the extent that it seeks information that may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine, the joint defense privilege or any other privilege. Q Plaintiff further objects to Definition No. Model objections to document requests, sometimes referred to as requests for production or RFPs, for an employer's counsel to use when responding to a plaintiff's document requests in a single plaintiff employment discrimination case brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA . (28)Tj Q 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 314.4112 86.2909 Tm q [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o obj)-2 (e)3.1 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (t)-2.2 (o t)-2 (he)3.1 ( phr)3 (a)4.9 (se)1.9 ( )-10.7 (\223)3.9 (c)-5.9 (hr)2.9 (oni)-1.9 (c)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-9.2 (i)-2.8 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)29.9 ( st)-3.7 (ud)-20.9 (y)20.8 (\224)4 ( )-10.8 (a)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( va)4.7 (g)10 (u)-9.9 (e)3.1 (, be)-5 (c)3 (a)4 (use)3 ( )]TJ endstream Plaintiff further objects to this request as duplicative, overbroad, and burdensome even if the term "reflected" were construed more narrowly to include only documents containing or including verbatim statements. -72 -24 Td >> /GS0 gs -39.96 -12 Td /Rotate 0 endobj (11)Tj -36 -24 Td Plaintiff will construe "during" to mean "in the course of.". 51.12 0 Td /TT0 8.03 Tf Q << -61.32 -48 Td >> /Kids [14 0 R 15 0 R] Missing that thirty-day deadline can be serious. h -332.51 -24 Td T* T* [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ [(\226 )-49.9 (c)4.7 (he)3.1 (m)8.9 (i)-2.7 (c)4.7 (a)3.1 (l )-42.9 (i)-1.1 (n )-50.8 (1985. -72 -24 Td 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.677 86.2909 Tm >> [(pl)-1.1 (a)3.1 (i)-2 (nt)-1.1 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( pur)2.9 (por)3.9 (t)-2.7 (s)-1.1 ( t)-2 (o de)4.8 (f)3 (i)-1.9 (n)-10 (e)3 ( t)-1.8 (he)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( b)-20.8 (y)20.7 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (i)-2.9 (n)-9.1 (g)9 ( a)4.9 ( f)2.2 (i)-1.1 (v)-10.9 (e)4 (-)3.8 (pa)-6.7 (g)9.9 (e)4 ( b)-9.1 (a)3.9 (c)3.1 (k)-9 (gr)2.9 (ound doc)3.1 (u)-9.9 (m)-2 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 ( t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( doe)4.8 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-3.7 ( )]TJ endobj Plaintiff will produce responsive, non-privileged documents in the order or arrangement in which they are maintained within the principal investigatory and case files. However, one of the objections I hadnt seen before: No preface or instruction shall be included with a set of interrogatories. /Font 141 0 R 48 0 Td Alternatively, Plaintiff will produce copies of the documents. Typically, if you requested a document, but the other side claims it doesn't exist, you can object to the judge if they try to introduce the document at trial. /Resources 103 0 R 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 6.1155 36 Tm [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t,)-2 ( af)4 (t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (a)3.1 (son)-11.1 (a)4.8 (bl)-2.8 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ (11)Tj -310.67 -24 Td 25.928 -24 Td 28 0 obj stream )-200.8 (27 )-199.1 (i)-2 (n )-190.8 (P)-3.2 (l)-2 (a)13.9 (i)-1.9 (n)9 (t)8.9 (i)-1.9 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (s)9.8 (\222)13 ( )]TJ [(a)4 (t)-1.9 ( a)3.9 (n)-20 (y)20 ( t)-2 (i)-2 (m)-2 (e)4 ( a)4.8 (nd f)3 (or)2.2 ( )-10 (a)4.8 (n)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (a)4 (so)-1.8 (n,)-1.8 ( t)-3.8 (o r)2.9 (e)3.2 (vi)-2 (se)2.9 (, su)-1.8 (pp)-1.8 (l)-3 (e)4 (m)-12 (e)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (, c)3.9 (or)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (, a)4.8 (dd t)-2.8 (o, or)3.8 ( )-9.9 (c)3 (l)-1.9 (a)-5.1 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (f)-7.9 (y)20.8 ( t)-1.9 (h)-10 (e)3 (se)2.3 ( R)-2.9 (e)3.8 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (e)4.8 (s.)-11.8 ( )]TJ [( t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( t)-2 (he)4.8 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (e)3.9 (d doc)3.1 (um)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (a)3 ( f)3.8 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 ( a)-6.9 (ge)4.8 (n)-10.7 (c)-5.2 (y)19 ( d)-9.8 (e)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (m)-1.1 (i)-2 (na)3.1 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on of)2.9 ( EP)-2.7 (A)1.9 (. (12)Tj ET >> f Andrew Felser is with Felser, PC, in Denver, Colorado. )9 ( )-989.9 ([)-6.1 (Th)1.8 (i)-1.9 (s )-182 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (q)10 (ue)4.9 (s)8.1 (t)-1.9 ( )-199.1 (i)-2.9 (s )-191.1 (l)-2 (i)-2.9 (st)-4 (e)4 (d )-189.1 (a)3 (s )-200.9 (N)1.9 (o. (17)Tj -154.07 -24 Td << /Fm2 Do /ExtGState 133 0 R 67.32 0 Td /Parent 15 0 R /TT2 12 Tf THIRD: "Relevant non-privileged and non-protected documents". (7. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.0848 75.2636 Tm %PDF-1.3 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm 44.87 0 Td [(R)-2.1 (e)3 (q)10.9 (ue)3.2 (s)9.8 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (f)1.9 (or)2.1 ( )10.9 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (s)-1.9 (si)-4 (ons )8.8 ($)2.2 (J)-11 (une)4.8 ( 29, 2017$)3 (])-7.8 (. /igrave /iacute /icircumflex /idieresis /eth /ntilde /ograve /oacute /ocircumflex /otilde Q /Filter /FlateDecode endobj [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ endstream [(i)-1.1 (s )-62.9 (l)-2 (i)-2 (st)-3.1 (e)3 (d )-49 (a)3.9 (s )-222.6 (N)1.9 (o. [(Th)1.8 (e)4.9 (se)3.1 ( G)2 (e)3.2 (n)-10 (e)4.8 (r)3 (a)3.2 (l)-1.9 ( O)1.9 (bj)-12 (e)4.8 (c)3.2 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on)-10.9 (s a)2.8 (ppl)-12 (y)20.8 ( t)-1.9 (o a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( of)2.9 ( t)-1.9 (he)3 ( )-9.9 (f)3.8 (ol)-2.8 (l)-1.9 (ow)1.9 (i)-1.9 (ng)10.7 ( R)-2.9 (e)3.1 (spons)-1.5 (e)3.1 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.1 (o sp)-2 (e)-7.8 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (f)-7.8 (i)-2 (c)3.9 ( )]TJ /PageElement 38 0 R 121.796 -24 Td -39.96 -12 Td ET (23)Tj (6)Tj Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory to the extent that it seeks documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. 192.96 0 Td A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. (11)Tj T* 36 0 Td /TT1 12 Tf Q /TT0 12 Tf Even so construed, the request is duplicative, overbroad, and burdensome to the extent that it calls for documents already produced to Defendant in response to Defendant's February 2, 1999 Request for Documents, including, but not limited to, documents produced to Plaintiff by third parties, transcripts of the depositions of third parties, and correspondence from third parties to Plaintiff. While "CID" is defined in Definition No. (11)Tj q Q [(C)-13 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (. Continue Reading Arent I Entitled to a Privilege Log? Q 47.77 0 Td 5. [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. q Responding party objects that the request fails to specifically describe each individual item sought or reasonably particularize each category of item sought. -103.32 -24 Td q /Resources 99 0 R 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re [(se)2.9 (r)3 (vi)-1.9 (c)4.7 (e)4 ( h)-10.8 (e)4.8 (r)3 (e)3.2 (o)-10 (f)3.8 (\224)4 ( a)3.2 (s )-2 (pl)-4 (a)4 (i)-2 (nt)-2 (i)-12 (f)2.9 (f)3.9 ( a)4 (ss)-2.8 (e)-6.9 (r)3.8 (t)-2.8 (s,)-2 ( b)-2 (ut)-3.9 ( a)4.7 (r)3 (e)3.1 ( du)-9.9 (e)4.8 ( on )-10.8 (O)1.9 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (obe)4.8 (r)3 ( 16, 2017. endobj Subject to and notwithstanding this objection, in responding to these discovery requests, Plaintiff will treat the term "third party," as extending to all individuals and entities, not named as parties to this lawsuit, listed on Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures. 30.72 0 Td 35 0 obj Without waiving, responding party states that all responsive, unprivileged, known, and reasonably available documents will be produced by Defendant, if they have not already been produced to Plaintiffs. T* 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm Therefore, there are no "statements" as that term is defined. [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (t)-3 (he)3 ( 1983 pa)4 (t)-1.9 (hol)-2 (og)-10 (y)20.8 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.7 (por)3 (t)-1.8 ( of)2.8 ( t)-1.8 (he)3 ( )-9.9 (st)-4 (ud)-10 (y)20.8 ( B)-3 (D)2 (N)2 (-)2.1 (77-)3 (420 )]TJ /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Fm0 Do 47.77 0 Td /Resources 83 0 R If the request would take an unreasonable amount of time or money to fulfill in relation to the reasonable needs of the case (proportionality), recite specific, persuasive facts that explain why, preferably in an affidavit. >> [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.8 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (;)-2 ( )9 (Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (a)3.9 (ni)-1.9 (m)-2.9 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 ( )]TJ >> << 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm T* You then diligentlysend your meet and confer letter stating that the documents are so disorganized that you cant make heads or tails as to which documents are responsive to which request. Opposing counsel respondssaying that the document production was in compliance with the code as the documents were produced as they are kept in the usual course of business and they will neither modify their response nor the production. 67.32 0 Td >> (4)Tj endobj Nearly all, if not all, documents in Plaintiff's files would thus "reflect" some such verbatim statement because to some degree the documents contain information derived from verbatim statements. /Rotate 0 /Resources 107 0 R $)3.1 (MON)2.8 (G)-8.7 (L)11.7 (Y)1.2 (04269006-)3 (07)-9.1 ($)2.9 ( [)-7.8 (Th)1.8 (is)-2.9 ( R)-2.2 (e)3 (q)10 (ue)4 (s)9.9 (t)-1.9 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (l)6 (is)-3 (t)-2 (e)3 (d a)4 (s )8.1 (N)2 (o. 36 -24 Td T* -78.23 -24 Td 78.23 0 Td 4 regarding "document" or "documents" to the extent that it purports to impose obligations greater than those set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. << BT 43 0 obj (10)Tj << [(l)-1.1 (i)-2 (st)-4.9 (e)4.8 (d a)3.1 (s )-1.8 (No)2 (. /TT1 12 Tf /TT0 12 Tf 168.84 0 Td (2)Tj 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.6 (r)2 (e)4.9 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (e)3.9 (s )-1.8 (a)2.1 (n)-9.9 (d obj)-1.9 (e)4.7 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (i)-2 (ons)-1.9 ( t)-1.9 (o pl)-2 (a)3.9 (i)-1.9 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)3 (\222)3.8 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.7 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (a)2.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( m)-2.7 (a)4.7 (d)-10.7 (e)3.9 ( so)-2 (l)-2.9 (e)3.9 (l)-11.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (f)3.8 (o)-9.9 (r)2.1 ( )]TJ Subject to and notwithstanding this objection, Plaintiff will use the more expansive definition of "third party" that it has provided in above Objection 3, and it will treat "statements" as covering those made by the individuals and entities listed in Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures during Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth. Project objectives often include both objectives and goals.Project objectives should not be confused with project management objectives. 48 0 obj 5. -339.35 -24 Td Furthermore, Defendant has access to the addresses and/or telephone numbers of those persons listed on Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures and can seek information by addressing formal or informal discovery directly from those entities. [(onc)4 (oge)4.8 (ni)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( i)-1.9 (n m)-2.8 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2 (c)3.9 (e)3.2 ( )-9.1 (pr)2.9 (oduc)3.1 (in)-12.9 (g)10.8 ( a)3.1 ( dose)-6.8 (-)2 (r)3 (e)4.9 (l)-2.8 (a)4.8 (t)-11.9 (e)3.1 (d )-10 (i)-2 (nc)4.8 (r)3 (e)3.1 (a)4.9 (s)-10.9 (e)3 ( in)-2 ( re)5 (na)4.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2.9 (ubul)-2 (e)4.8 ( )-9.9 (a)-6.9 (de)4.8 (nom)-1.9 (a)3.9 (s,)-1.8 ( a)1.3 ( r)-6.1 (a)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ SET NUMBER: ONE (1) To Plaintiff, Acme, Inc . PROPOUNDING PARTY: PAUL SAMPLE . -6 -24 Td /CropBox [0 0 612 792] T* T* Interview memoranda of the Antitrust Division, however, and notes of such interviews are protected from discovery by the work product doctrine. -39.96 -12 Td [(c)4 (onduc)4.8 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d c)3.2 (h)-10 (r)3.8 (oni)-2.7 (c)4.7 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)3 (it)5 (y)20.9 ( )-10.8 (st)-3.1 (udi)-2 (e)3 (s )-1.8 (on)-1.8 ( )-10.9 (g)9.9 (l)-21.9 (y)20.8 (phosa)1.2 (te. (2. ET /Contents [68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R] T* -44.76 -24 Td Inserting this language into the request only hurts you. )Tj Responding party objects to this request as it seeks documents that are not within defendants possession, custody, or control.

Cynthia Hadden And Gary Dourdan, Kings Road Taylors Lakes Accident, Dave Ramsey 25 House Rule, Www 4myhr Com Www Marriottbenefits Com, Llama 1911 Feeding Issues, Articles S